"Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them." Albert Einstein Women in the Middle East: April 2007 XING View Nina Mohadjer's profile on LinkedIn
XING View Nina Mohadjer's profile on LinkedIn
Bookmark and Share

Women in the Middle East

General women issues, middle eastern women rights, islamic women's rights

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Middle Eastern vs. western women working mentality

It's funny. Today I had a seminar about comparative women's rights. Very interesting class! Very nice looking, well dresses law-professor, which is becoming a rarity. (Don't worry, he is not interested for my gender...:) and we were talking about Multicultural problems. Meaning whether or not women from different cultures have more difficulties adapting to a certain legal system. During the discussion the ban of the hijab in France came up. Additionally the question of FGC, and last but not least the question of culture and its effect on the legal systems.
while we touched the subject of the hijab, I mentioned that while being very religious, I believe I do understand the French government. They separated State and Religion at the beginning of the 20th century, and from then on no governmental institution is supposed to be religious. as we say here in the United states that the constitution is "color-blind", the french believe that their Constitution is... well, not atheist, since that would be a believe as well. But let's say: without belief. Now, you tell me: what's wrong with that? I don't think anything. I absolutely believe that religion and state should be separated. We see on the sample of the Iranian Revolution what kind of misery the mixing can bring. religion tells you not to lie. well, in politics you are supposed to lie to get somewhere. Religion tells you to believe in one superior power, which can not be challenged. Politics tells you, go after the big guy and make him fall, so that you can be on top.
Now, back to the women issues: awhile we are sitting week after week in a classroom and discussing what needs to be done to help the weak women in the middle east, who apparently have no rights, I came to the conclusion that they enjoy life much more than we do. Seriously. Listen to this: My mom showed one of my pictures to a cousin, who lives in Iran. She does not work, has to grown-up children, parties and travels. Basically: la dolce vita. she saw my photo, and the first thing she said was: "Oh, Nina looks really really tired." My mother told her that I was working, studying and having a family. My cousin said: "Tell her not to do the work. what does she want to work and study for? Tell her to enjoy life." Now, see, that's what I mean. In her opinion I should be sitting home, partying and start knitting socks for my grandchildren already! There are two issues: My kids tell me that they never want to have children, and number two: even though I am patient and can knit very well, I'd rather work and by my grandchildren socks from Christian Dior!

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Women in the Middle East: Real Islam or Real Islam?

Women in the Middle East: Real Islam or Real Islam?
As Featured On Ezine Articles

Do men PMS????

Believe it or not, I had never heard of the term PMS before I moved to this country. It might be based on the fact that I do not "suffer" under this syndrome, neither does anyone I know, maybe it is based that in Germany or Iran noone ever talked about this.
Well, anyways, when I heard the term I remembered it, at some points I mixed it up with the term PMI :), which as we all know is a Pre- Mortgage-Insurance!!!
Now, in this country EVERY woman I got to know was at least once a month talking about PMSing.
As mentioned, I do not have this syndrome, but.... I think my husband does! So do husbands of some of my friends. Recently I was sitting with two very dear friends in a cafe and we noticed that. No, no, this is not a cultural nor age thing. One of the husbands is Iranian, one is South-Korean, and one is USAmerican. They are all in different age groups and have different jobs. The only denumeriator is: MEN. O.K., I know from statistics that a sample group needs at least 30 samples, but well, we cheat a little and take only these 3.
And yes, they all PMS. Actually not monthly, but daily. Every day mine finds something that went wrong. My grandmother always used to say: "Be patient with men."But you now what? I think since we women started emancipating ourselves, we stopped beeing too patient. For nearly 15 years, I always leave him alone when he comes home, don't complain about things, and try to be a little a like a "housewife of the 1950s ", well, those who know me will fall laughing from the chairs. Yes, me as a housewife! Very funny!!! But you know, recently, actually within the past year, my patience is hanging on a very thin string. I wish my husband did not know that I do not PMS, and that he would treat me with the same patience I treated him daily for the past 15 years. Now you do the maths.
To my husband: Darling, now you be patient, smile and be like a man from the new millenium.

Labels: , ,

Friday, April 06, 2007

Are women politically under-represented?

I consider myself as a cultural feminist. Not a liberal one who would say that all rights between men and women have to be equal. In my mind that would not work. Maybe I actually do not want it to work, since I am too egoistic and would like to keep the rights customized to my gender plus have more. However, I would not want anyone telling me that because certain women's rights exist, I am obligated to use them. I would want to have the freedom to choose if I want to work, be politically active, or stay home and spend time in my kitchen.
I love it when women get elected as presidents or leaders of nations, since it shows the world that the nation voting for them did not "mind" their gender, but cared about what they had to say and what they wanted to achieve during their time in the office. Sure enough I might not agree with some of those women who are leaders now, but in my opinion it shows a great achievement and the fact that the fight our grandmothers fought was worth it. Since they might have not had the opportunity to vote or get elected, but our generation has all those rights in many countries.
Jane Kramer's article was very interesting to me, not only because she wrote about France- a country I truly love- but also since a very close friend of mine, who happens to be French was telling me about the problems French women have encountered. I have to admit that I did not believe her. How was it possible for a country where wonderful couturiers worked, where the best patisseries were produced and where the statement "Tousjour l'amour" existed, be so backwards when it came to gender rights? I always thought that French women knew about their husbands' little affairs and thought the same way they thought about the late President Mitterrand " Monsieur le president comprend quelque chose de l'amour" (Mister president understands Love.).
But they seem to be suffering in their own way, which is indicated by the divorce numbers. It was interesting to read that Parite is not neutral, but it is enforcing political parties to be represented fifty per cent by women, is an inequality of its own. On the other hand it becomes questionable to me why the new French generation is not interested in what their "mothers", the old activists had fought for. Maybe it is because those women were trying to hard to accomplish everything at the same time, and the new generation is tired of being like "two-sided candles"? The example of the psychologist who runs home to prepare a three course lunch for her husband is the best to show that in a way, French women like to be mothers and wives in the traditional way, but on the other hand they are obligated to use all the rights, which were given to them. Darren Rosenblums' article states the same situation for Brazilian women, who, no matter what kind of out-of-the home-work they have, are expected to cook dinner. That group of French women who like to work in politics, like Francoise de Panafieu, notices how intimidated men get by a women's presence in a "man's job."
Another question, which came to my mind while reading about the under-representation of women in the French government is as follows: assuming that half of France's population are men, and the other half women, it would be logical to think that women would support each other and vote for politicians of their own gender. Why does that not happen? Is it because they not trust each other, or maybe because they are so used of seeing men doing the political work, that they do not really care? Historically speaking it were women who supported the French revolution, and as in one of the first articles we read, who were standing behind the role-taking men of putting the monarchy aside. Compared to the rest of Europe women in France at the present time are "secretaries and mistresses." Parite is not seen as giving women the option to become what they want, but as the article indicates "make sure that as many incompetent women are in the political program as incompetent men."
As Darren Rosenblum states in his article, CEDAW alone is not enough to reach equality and parity without the help of the signing nations. As long as they are not ready to accept and to adapt CEDAW rules in their society and think that the rules are not compatible with their cultural norms, the rules stand "in the air".In conclusion I would say that women should have the right to pursue any career they want to and that no law should take away from this right. However, imposing a women's representation is not the solution. Moreover, enforcement would be another barrier. The representation should follow naturally when society feels ready to accept women as more than mistresses and secretaries. And maybe at a time when a man feels that the time has come for him to prepare dinner for his wife for a change.

Do Islamic Women have any rights???

I know that by saying this many eyebrows will be raised: Islam is a modern religion with the aim of emancipation. Yes, I know, looking at the Burka of Afghan women, looking at the hijab of Iranian women, reading that FGC is mostly done in the Islamic countries of Africa, reading how poorly women in Islamic countries are treated does not really prove my point. But give me a chance to explain my point without stopping to read my paper, and I am sure that at the end of this you will understand my statement.
Since it would be too broad to consider all the Islamic countries, I will concentrate on Iran as a sample and compare it to some other Islamic countries when necessary.
Before the islamization of Persia, Persians were mainly Zoroastrians. Women had numerous rights: right to divorce, right to own real property, right of leadership etc. I could go on and on. The other Middle Eastern countries did not have any of those rights. Women were seen as "birth-machines" for male production only. Now, do not ask me how they imagined future reproduction without girls!
Islam came from Saudi Arabia, a country where girls were buried right after their birth and women who dared to give birth to baby girls were mostly kicked out of their homes, had to see their husbands bringing other women into their homes to finally produce a male child. Women had no right to education, nor to real property and were seen as property of their fathers first and then their husbands. The motto was very simple: Be happy that I allow you to live at all.
When Islam was introduced to Saudi Arabia, the Koran (translated meaning: recitation) became a revolutionary rule-book. Not only did it speak about how to believe in God and how to appreciate nature, but additionally it spoke about family law, about wills and inheritance, and about women. Many might be surprised to hear that Islam is the first world religion, dedicating one chapter (sure) to women (Sure 4, Nessah). It speaks about giving girls the right to live, and that those parents who buried their baby girls should fear the Judgment Day, since those girls would want to know why they had to die because of their gender. It continues about the woman in the marriage, and it also speaks about divorce. Unlike most other religions, Islam does give women the right of requesting a divorce for numerous reasons (one of them being if the husband does not pay any sexual attention to her). It continues with the rights of women after their divorce, indicating that no man should mistreat his ex-wife; neither should he take their children away, mostly not if they are still being nursed by her. He should give her dowry and make sure that she is provided for. [[4.4] And give women their dowries as a free gift, but if they of themselves be pleased to give up to you a portion of it, then eat it with enjoyment and with wholesome result.]
After saying all of this I can imagine anyone asking me: if this religion is so modern, why are women in Islamic countries treated so poorly?
For being able to answer this question, I will give you a little historical background of Islam: As I mentioned above, before Islam women had basically no rights. And while reading Islamic rules now, we do not have to look at them from our modern, maybe western point of view, but mostly from the eyes of the women from 1,400 years ago. I give you one sample: Islamic rules indicate that in a legal situation, one would need two female witnesses, which would be the equivalent to one male witness. I have to admit, the first time I read this in the Koran, I was furious! What does that mean? Are women worth half of a man? The answer is NO! Put yourself in the same position of an Arab woman in the year 600 B.C.: You had no rights before Islam, and now you can even become a witness. Now, how does that sound? Or another sample: You were not able to stay in your house if your husband decided to leave you, and now he has to make sure that you will do fine after a divorce. See the difference?
Another question people usually ask me is about the hijab. Hijab means cover in Arabic. I did a lot of research on this, since the Islamic revolution, which required that (literally from one day to another) women should wear a scarf over their head and a longer coat or a veil (chador). I could not understand why women should cover themselves up, while men could walk around anyhow they wanted. While no where in the Koran is written that a woman should wear a Burka or cover her head, I found a historical explanation: The head cover was originally for the Prophet Muhammad's wife, or any other female related to the Bani-Hashem Family and the Quaraish tribe (While Surnames did not exist at that time in history, people used their tribal names to indicate where they belonged to.). Originally this cover was meant to make a distinction between the women form the higher groups and the working class women. Similar to the difference between women in the US Northern and Southern States: women of the South, who had their slaves working for them on the farms, were not supposed to have a tanned skin, since it would show that they were working outside. Here, it was supposed to show a woman's cleanliness to cover her head in order for her not to get dust or dirt into her hair. The body cover also is not written literally in the Koran, but is based on history. Saudi Arabia is geographically one of the hottest countries on the globe. With temperatures of around 120 F (50 Celsius) in the summer, it is logical that people like to wear fewer clothes. And since back then women did not have any rights, imagine who would have come to rescue a woman in case of a sexual crime? Exactly: no one! To protect women the Koran indicated that women should cover the space between their shoulders, meaning their cleavage and should not show their body jewelry. (At that time working women would wear ankle bracelets with bell-charms, which would make a tremendous sound while walking.) Now you will probably ask: Why are women then wearing the hijab or Burka?
First, let us look at Iran. Iran is the only country where women wear their head scarves differently than in the other Islamic countries. In Taliban- Afghanistan women were forced to wear a Burka, in Saudi Arabia they also wear a Burka, which looks different than the Afghan one. In conclusion one could say that the different understanding of the koranic word of "cover your cleavage" is based on the geographical location of the practicing countries. In Pre-Islam Iran women were wearing something similar to the "Greek-dress", a simple dress with a shawl in the back. The shawl became the head cover. In Saudi Arabia, people did not want to compromise and covered the whole woman. Do you see the difference? It is not Islam indicating what women should wear; it is the original tradition of the countries adapting their life styles to their understanding of the Islamic way of life.
The second question I am usually asked is about the famous Islamic statement, why men can have four wives, and that this would degrade women. First of all, the Koran does not say that any man can have four wives. There are numerous conditions on that statement: first, the man must be financially sound, he has to have the permission of his first wife, and most importantly he has to have some supporting reasons. If for example, his wife is ill, or she can not bear any children (see the difference to the pre-Islam time: the Koran does not make a gender differentiation), and most of all treat them all equally. [[4.3] And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the right course.] In case he does not, any of the women could request a divorce. I believe the latter one explains everything! I can not even treat two pairs of shoes the same way! How should it be possible to treat two women exactly the same??? Hence, one can see that the Koran makes it very difficult for men to take advantage of the rule. But, before closing this chapter I should explain why it is written in the book at all. Again, this has protective reasons for women. At a time in history, where women were not able to work, where society would treat a widowed woman poorly, or where a woman who did not have any male supporters was seen as an easy target, a man who was financially sound, and hence able to support her, was allowed to have another wife. This was also the Islamic way of keeping women away from prostitution.
I could go on and on and bring you more samples. However, concluding I would say that Islam does give women a lot of rights. Sadly, around 80% of the Islamic population is illiterate, and from that number more than half are women. Some people take advantage of their illiteracy by saying that no matter what gets done with them, they should obey, since this is the Islamic way. The countries traditions do not want women to be able to read and write, in order for them to read the Koran and become able to defend themselves based on the Islamic rules. Unfortunately the newest political developments and the involvement of terrorists in the name of Islam put a bad light on a religion, which was supposed to bring people closer and give women rights. Personally it makes me very sad and upset to see how people, who do not understand anything about Islam, act and try to explain their un-Islamic actions under the guise of the religion.
Islam is probably the most misinterpreted religion, and until people are not willing to find out the true base of Islam, people like me have to continue telling others about the meaning of the Islamic rules in order to reveal the un-Islamic actions of some countries.